Comments on: m-theory is wrong. string theory is false. and the big bang is still occuring. http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/ Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:43:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: beingdevious http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-315 beingdevious Sun, 25 Feb 2007 16:04:50 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-315 in reply to Andrew... I may have the specifics of the singularity wrong, but so far, that is what I have come to understand from all of the other theories and research. And yes, I do suggest that the universe is in a continuous state between matters. a constant revolution of all things that exist and don't exist. But I can't prove it either... It's just an idea of mine. Thanks for the comment! -AJ in reply to Andrew…

I may have the specifics of the singularity wrong, but so far, that is what I have come to understand from all of the other theories and research.
And yes, I do suggest that the universe is in a continuous state between matters. a constant revolution of all things that exist and don’t exist. But I can’t prove it either… It’s just an idea of mine.

Thanks for the comment!
-AJ

]]> By: Andrew http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-312 Andrew Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:00:06 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-312 "The big bang theory revolves on all of matter being created from the singularity. but it only happened once and can never happen again. thats dumb." As far as I've understood it, this is simply not the case. By the way the nature of the big bang is described, as far as physics is concerned, we can never really know at all anything that happened before the moment of the big bang, nor can anything that happened before the moment the universe as far as we understand it began be reconstructed, predicted or modeled. (re-reading now...) Are you suggesting that the universe cycles between states of matter-dominance (baryonic matter, anyway) and dark matter-dominance? I think that's an intereresting idea, though damned if I know how anybody could go about proving that. Peace, Andrew “The big bang theory revolves on all of matter being created from the singularity. but it only happened once and can never happen again. thats dumb.”

As far as I’ve understood it, this is simply not the case. By the way the nature of the big bang is described, as far as physics is concerned, we can never really know at all anything that happened before the moment of the big bang, nor can anything that happened before the moment the universe as far as we understand it began be reconstructed, predicted or modeled.

(re-reading now…)

Are you suggesting that the universe cycles between states of matter-dominance (baryonic matter, anyway) and dark matter-dominance? I think that’s an intereresting idea, though damned if I know how anybody could go about proving that.

Peace,
Andrew

]]> By: beingdevious http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-309 beingdevious Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:29:29 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-309 In reply to Argus.... Finally, someone who is willing to debate. First, let me say that I am NOT a physicist, I am not a scientist, nor do I have any formal education in these fields. I am merely writing my own personal theory. This is my opinion. I can agree with you on the fact that the in/out dimension, is nothing more than advancing or retracting on any given dimension. so, lets void that one. I can make sense of the 4 dimensions, and also the now, 8 dimensions(voided the in/out). so I don't really know where to settle. I guess we'll see when our time ends? who knows. Also, these are not really complaints against other theories, this is simply my own conceived alternate. I just don't see how something can start without the exact power it releases in the explosion.. Thank you for making some sense and providing a decent argument. Thank you for not calling me a Moron, or an Idiot, though I may be wrong. -AJ In reply to Argus….

Finally, someone who is willing to debate. First, let me say that I am NOT a physicist, I am not a scientist, nor do I have any formal education in these fields. I am merely writing my own personal theory. This is my opinion. I can agree with you on the fact that the in/out dimension, is nothing more than advancing or retracting on any given dimension. so, lets void that one.

I can make sense of the 4 dimensions, and also the now, 8 dimensions(voided the in/out). so I don’t really know where to settle. I guess we’ll see when our time ends? who knows.

Also, these are not really complaints against other theories, this is simply my own conceived alternate. I just don’t see how something can start without the exact power it releases in the explosion..

Thank you for making some sense and providing a decent argument. Thank you for not calling me a Moron, or an Idiot, though I may be wrong.

-AJ

]]> By: Argus http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-308 Argus Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:58:54 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-308 Your argument does not make any sense and I don’t really know where to start. Your “agreement” with Sting Theory’s ten dimensions is what really made me cringe, so I’ll begin there. Your friend was right in saying that your ideas involve only 4 dimensions. Moving forward or backward along the x-axis is motion in one dimension. The zero point is irrelevant. This goes for the y and z axes as well, making only 3 dimensions. Your in and out dimension is also simply movement in one or more dimensions, not a dimension of its own. If you disagree look in any physics book and open to the one dimensional motion chapter. You also say that time should be two dimensions. Although time does have an arrow, only progressing in one way, physics does not differentiate between the past and the future, they are treated in the same way and are only one dimensions, adding to a total of 4. The remaining dimensions, as String Theory states, are curled up so small that they do not affect our everyday lives. Your complaints also stem from the fact that these theories do not provide for a pre-big bang and that they say that they cannot occur again. However the theories do have proposed explanations for a pre-big band and they some say that another big bang could occur. Look up “branes” for an example. Your argument does not make any sense and I don’t really know where to start.
Your “agreement” with Sting Theory’s ten dimensions is what really made me cringe, so I’ll begin there. Your friend was right in saying that your ideas involve only 4 dimensions. Moving forward or backward along the x-axis is motion in one dimension. The zero point is irrelevant. This goes for the y and z axes as well, making only 3 dimensions. Your in and out dimension is also simply movement in one or more dimensions, not a dimension of its own. If you disagree look in any physics book and open to the one dimensional motion chapter.
You also say that time should be two dimensions. Although time does have an arrow, only progressing in one way, physics does not differentiate between the past and the future, they are treated in the same way and are only one dimensions, adding to a total of 4. The remaining dimensions, as String Theory states, are curled up so small that they do not affect our everyday lives.
Your complaints also stem from the fact that these theories do not provide for a pre-big bang and that they say that they cannot occur again. However the theories do have proposed explanations for a pre-big band and they some say that another big bang could occur. Look up “branes” for an example.

]]> By: beingdevious http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-304 beingdevious Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:40:19 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-304 In reply to Samuel... You know, I've been battling this too. I agree f/b and u/d can be seen as one vector each. But I'm seeing the 0,0,0 point as the starting point for each of the 10 vectors. I dunno, I can't find a way to prove this yet, maybe in time. In reply to Samuel…

You know, I’ve been battling this too. I agree f/b and u/d can be seen as one vector each. But I’m seeing the 0,0,0 point as the starting point for each of the 10 vectors. I dunno, I can’t find a way to prove this yet, maybe in time.

]]> By: Samuel http://beingdevious.com/theory/m-theory-is-wrong-string-theory-is-false-and-the-big-bang-is-still-occuring/comment-page-1/#comment-299 Samuel Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:58:08 +0000 http://beingdevio.us/blog/?p=7#comment-299 i agree with everything in this EXCEPT, your "10 dimensions" thing. yes, the are ten dimensions, 11 if you count the first point, but f/b is one dimension, u/d is one, so on, so forth. i agree with everything in this EXCEPT, your “10 dimensions” thing. yes, the are ten dimensions, 11 if you count the first point, but f/b is one dimension, u/d is one, so on, so forth.

]]>