m-theory is wrong. string theory is false. and the big bang is still occuring.

Dare I say it?

Dare I go against those damn physicists that know EVERYTHING?

Yeah, I will.

Have you ever heard of a Möbius Strip? you’ve probably seen it, our 4th grade art teachers showed us how to make one..

Basically its a one sided strip of paper. stop. think about that. one sided? oh.. but a piece of paper has 2 sides? really?

I suggest you try it. because I’m not writing this to explain to you something you should already know. look it up. thats why we have google.

Now onto the good stuff.
I was watching this little video on youtube the other day that explained string theory, and its 10, wait, 9, no, 11, wait.. 93849032 dimensions. I wasn’t satisfied with that, so I started thinking.

These theories that we are stuck with all revolve around “the singularity”, or the beginning. but none of them can explain what was BEFORE the big bang which doesn’t sit well with me. There was something BEFORE, there IS something on the other side of this “singularity” Actually, what I’m hypothesizing now is that the singularity is an ongoing phenomena. So here it goes…

What if the universe wasn’t a “uni”verse. but rather a constant omniverse. (ok, for those of you that i just lost, just keep walking….)

Take that mobius strip, and connect the edges of it (in your mind) so that its NEVER ends. something like this:

Boy SurfaceNow what you see is called a “Boy Surface.” This is something that is a 3 dimensional object and yet has only one side. It has no inside, no outside, no point that it starts from. What if that was our omniverse.

The big bang theory revolves on all of matter being created from the singularity. but it only happened once and can never happen again. thats dumb. With this boy surface, there’s a center point that eventually all points return to. Now, as for matter, it had to take a hell of a lot to actually create it right, you know, atoms smashing, particles colliding and whatnot. well, in big bang, we don’t know what created that initial force, but in my theory we do. Every time a particle or unit of matter enters my singularity, it collides with its inverse object. its opposite. thus, creating (with opposite but equal force) a mini-bang. now, multiply that reaction to by the number of every unit of matter in existence, and we have a big bang.. more importantly, an ongoing big-bang. matter enters the singularity and is destroyed and also creates its opposite in the process.. new matter.

think of it like this. remember those little toys we had when we were kids that created sparks when we wound them up. it was cause by continuous beating of flint and metal. constantly grinding away. thats whats happening here, but in a much larger scale and without the possibility to end.

Now take into mind numbers. for every number you know of or can think of, it has an inverse. its absolute opposite. apply that to matter and thus we have now explained dark matter. Dark matter is the idea that there is an opposite force that equals, but is negative to everything. but we could never find it. well, here it is. its right there on the boy surface, it gets created every time light matter is destroyed. and since this is a single surface, we can catch it. i just don’t know how yet.

now, enter the fact that science has proven that the known universe is constantly expanding, and at that, faster now than before. well how does that happen? that doesn’t make sense.. or does it? if we examine the “edge” of the boy surface, which is really a horizon, we can see an end, though its not really the end of the universe. It’s just out of our range of sight. So, the universe doesn’t have an edge, it has a horizon.

So whats a black hole, how many dimensions are there, what is time?

black holes I’ve had an interesting thought on. take your paper mobius strip and poke a hole in it. now you’re on the other side.. but then again, you’re not since its one sided. this would explain why we can see a black hole as a plane and it has a singularity in the the middle of it. its a portal to the exact opposite of where we are now. its a jump between the positive and the negative.

And what of dimensions? well, i took string theory to heart. I can foresee 10 dimensions. not 11. some could call this 4, but I’m sticking with 10. you have:

  1. forward and backwards
  2. up and down
  3. left and right
  4. in and out (growth and shrinking… think breathing)
  5. positive and negative in time.

i got into a debate with someone who said this was 4. but he and Capt. Morgan had been playing. he didn’t take into consideration of the 0 point. forwards and backwards on the x axis in the positive is one dimension. f/b on the x axis in the negative is another. this applies to all 3 scales. x,y,z thus giving us 6 dimensions. In and out dimension is growth and shrink from 0 point. thats also 2 in 1, so now we have 8. and then we have time. positive and negative time. (negative is one i have yet to explain).. all in all, we have 10.

so, in the end we my theory shows that our universe isn’t expanding, rather.. revolving. and that the singularity is not only the point of creation, but a point of eventual return, and big bang wasn’t once, but always and forever continuous

EDIT:

In response to a few comments and people I have conversed with, lets eliminate the growth/shrinking dimension. Its crap. It’s nothing more than advancing or retracting on all axes. So, we’re down to either 8 or 4 Dimensions..

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Category: theory
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
6 Responses
  1. Samuel says:

    i agree with everything in this EXCEPT, your “10 dimensions” thing. yes, the are ten dimensions, 11 if you count the first point, but f/b is one dimension, u/d is one, so on, so forth.

  2. beingdevious says:

    In reply to Samuel…

    You know, I’ve been battling this too. I agree f/b and u/d can be seen as one vector each. But I’m seeing the 0,0,0 point as the starting point for each of the 10 vectors. I dunno, I can’t find a way to prove this yet, maybe in time.

  3. Argus says:

    Your argument does not make any sense and I don’t really know where to start.
    Your “agreement” with Sting Theory’s ten dimensions is what really made me cringe, so I’ll begin there. Your friend was right in saying that your ideas involve only 4 dimensions. Moving forward or backward along the x-axis is motion in one dimension. The zero point is irrelevant. This goes for the y and z axes as well, making only 3 dimensions. Your in and out dimension is also simply movement in one or more dimensions, not a dimension of its own. If you disagree look in any physics book and open to the one dimensional motion chapter.
    You also say that time should be two dimensions. Although time does have an arrow, only progressing in one way, physics does not differentiate between the past and the future, they are treated in the same way and are only one dimensions, adding to a total of 4. The remaining dimensions, as String Theory states, are curled up so small that they do not affect our everyday lives.
    Your complaints also stem from the fact that these theories do not provide for a pre-big bang and that they say that they cannot occur again. However the theories do have proposed explanations for a pre-big band and they some say that another big bang could occur. Look up “branes” for an example.

  4. beingdevious says:

    In reply to Argus….

    Finally, someone who is willing to debate. First, let me say that I am NOT a physicist, I am not a scientist, nor do I have any formal education in these fields. I am merely writing my own personal theory. This is my opinion. I can agree with you on the fact that the in/out dimension, is nothing more than advancing or retracting on any given dimension. so, lets void that one.

    I can make sense of the 4 dimensions, and also the now, 8 dimensions(voided the in/out). so I don’t really know where to settle. I guess we’ll see when our time ends? who knows.

    Also, these are not really complaints against other theories, this is simply my own conceived alternate. I just don’t see how something can start without the exact power it releases in the explosion..

    Thank you for making some sense and providing a decent argument. Thank you for not calling me a Moron, or an Idiot, though I may be wrong.

    -AJ

  5. Andrew says:

    “The big bang theory revolves on all of matter being created from the singularity. but it only happened once and can never happen again. thats dumb.”

    As far as I’ve understood it, this is simply not the case. By the way the nature of the big bang is described, as far as physics is concerned, we can never really know at all anything that happened before the moment of the big bang, nor can anything that happened before the moment the universe as far as we understand it began be reconstructed, predicted or modeled.

    (re-reading now…)

    Are you suggesting that the universe cycles between states of matter-dominance (baryonic matter, anyway) and dark matter-dominance? I think that’s an intereresting idea, though damned if I know how anybody could go about proving that.

    Peace,
    Andrew

  6. beingdevious says:

    in reply to Andrew…

    I may have the specifics of the singularity wrong, but so far, that is what I have come to understand from all of the other theories and research.
    And yes, I do suggest that the universe is in a continuous state between matters. a constant revolution of all things that exist and don’t exist. But I can’t prove it either… It’s just an idea of mine.

    Thanks for the comment!
    -AJ

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>